File talk:Aura fades while saying little children of morganna.jpg

Relevancy?
Is there really any point in highlighting this particular line? Because I'm in a deletion-happy mood. Just give me a good reason.--OtakuD50 21:49, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Even I don't think it's necessary. We already have an image from the scene with a much more visible Aura. --Rpg 22:20, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * It provides characterization, and imagery of Aura's method of transportation. It also adds much needed color to an artical with too few pictures for such an important character. Seriously, characters with less of a role than Aura have far more pictures on their page. I also uploaded an exponentually smaller picture than I usually do to save space.--Falcon At 22:59, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of pictures on her page. Besides, more pictures isn't necessarily a good thing.  They're more than just for dressing up the page.  What's important is that the pictures illustrate something.  A lot of character articles with more pictures generally just have a gallery full of pictures we don't want to waste, but we don't really integrate into the article.  Integration is key.  I'm willing to keep this or any image as long as it illustrates something and is integrated properly, but we already have the text of her saying that line, we don't need an image as corroboration.  I feel the same way about the Kite and Mia image you uploaded, by the way; I just acted faster on this one because it's Aura.--OtakuD50 23:07, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, upon a second look, it looks like the Mia pic is implemented properly, I just generally disagree with using it in the Twilight Bracelet article.--OtakuD50 23:14, March 15, 2010 (UTC)