Talk:Aura (G.U.)

Wait, why was this done? The whole point of the split profiles has in my experience been for characters who underwent major personality/appearance/name changes. But Aura has remained a constant through it all. If there's a policy in place to split everything by era, I'll understand then, but if not, this wasn't necessary. --Rpg 02:26, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

It was an era decision. I was emulating what we did for Cubia. (Plus the page was huge). Outlaw630 02:38, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know the page was huge. I poured my heart into making it. Guess I'll just go with it. Does this mean there will also be a Aura (LINK) page? --Rpg 02:44, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it's because it'd be ridiculous to put so much info on one page, though I agree with you that we started to do it mainly for personality changes. I dunno. We may do a LINK page too. Kulaguy 03:31, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * On that matter, I'd point out this page is listed as Aura R:2, which would not apply to LINK. I'll go ahead and make it, and you can lock it if you want. I'll adjust the older page as necessary as well.--Rpg 03:37, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * So, shouldn't we move this page to Aura (G.U.)? Kulaguy 19:44, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Appearance
http://i739.photobucket.com/albums/xx32/falcon_at/aurafull.png
 * Crap, I forgot to crop it. This is an attempt to see Aura's entire body. used mutiple screen shots from her single appearance and some contrast settings, but there's a big white hole in her chest no mater where I took my shot. Can this be used in the artical, or is the quality embarissing? Or is it irrelevent? I don't think that it is, due to there being no shots of her dress in R:2.--Falcon At 23:41, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I already tried this once, and none of my attempts reached anything I considered usable on the wiki. This definitely does not meet wiki standards. --Rpg 23:49, March 15, 2010 (UTC)